？？？？？？？？？？？？？？

全民皆公民，不存在敌对异教徒(Kafir Harbi)或齐米异教徒(Kafir Dhimmi)

公民社会组织联合声明

30/6/2016

全民皆公民，不存在敌对异教徒(Kafir Harbi)或齐米异教徒(Kafir Dhimmi)

我们以下联署的公民组织社会，对于把一些公民列为“敌对异教徒”（Kafir Harbi）的课题，采取以下的立场。

1.       把人类为“敌对异教徒”（对抗伊斯兰统治者的异教徒）及“齐米异教徒”（Kafir Dhimmi）（接受伊斯兰统治及保护的异教徒），是古代拥有单一宗教的人民以及人权不被尊崇的时候的国家做法。在古时代的情境里，当不同宗教的国家打起战来，这些国与国之间的战争常常带上了宗教战争的色彩。事实上，许多战争虽然名义上是为宗教而战，然而最大的意图还是占领更多土地以获得更多的权力与财富。由于没有宗教自由的保障，穆斯林的宗教自由常常得依赖于伊斯兰统治者的强盛。将非穆斯林归成两类，即可以被杀戮的“敌对异教徒”及接受伊斯兰统治的“齐米异教徒”，是发生在一个深层宗教敌对的特殊情境里。

2.       在目前多国拥有多元宗教的现代世界里，这种“敌对异教徒/齐米异教徒”的二分法，置放在现代国际及国家的情境里，不仅仅是不合时宜，而且高度危险。在国际的情境里，当两个国家打战，这些战争不能被视为宗教战争，因为现代国家更关心的是政治地缘利益，而不是共同的宗教。在国家的情境里，如果发生非穆斯林对穆斯林的罪案，非穆斯林的犯罪者是侵犯国家的法律，必须以法制裁，而穆斯林的犯罪者也同样一致对待。非穆斯林的犯罪者不是可以被穆斯林亲手杀戮的“敌对异教徒”。任何“亲手杀戮”的建议，无疑将毁掉国家，因为这些建议也将引起报复。

3.       伊斯兰大思想家尤索夫阿卡拉达威博士（Dr Yusuf al-Qaradawy）建议类似“齐米异教徒”的字眼应该被抛弃，而非穆斯林应该被称为“muwatinun” (公民)，与穆斯林公民一样。事实上，这并不是新事物。根据埃及学者法蒂奥斯曼博士（Dr Fathi Osman），穆斯林及非穆斯林在先知穆罕默德统治的麦地那，享有同等的公民地位，因为麦地那是一个多元宗教的国家。根据法律学者阿古奈米莫哈末达拉（Al Ghunaimi Mohammad Talaat），非穆斯林人民被列为“齐米异教徒”的使用，在最后一个哈立法国，即奥斯曼尼耶王朝（Utthmaniah Empire）于1839年承认穆斯林及基督徒地位同等的原则后，已经被弃用。

4.       诞生于1963年，由马来亚、新加坡、沙巴及砂捞越以同等伙伴形成的马来西亚，是一个居民多元、公民性质的联邦。穆斯林与非穆斯林之间的关系，事实上是公民与公民的关系，同舟共济、生死与共的关系。他们的关系不是敌人。他们也不是一边是“保护者”，另一边是“受保护者”的关系。“敌对异教徒”或“齐米异教徒”字眼的使用，不只是伤害了非穆斯林公民的感受，同时也带来负面的意涵，让人以为马来西亚的形成是一项马来半岛（马来亚）扩张领地的计划。

5.       所有人民应该继续维护伊斯兰教在马来西亚联邦及除了砂劳越以外的所有州属的法定地位，同时不让任何一方滥用此法定地位以压制思想与言论自由，或边缘化任何人以至影响伊斯兰教的名誉。马来西亚联邦宪法第十条文保障人民的言论及表达意见的自由，不分种族或宗教；而宪法第八条文确立所有公民在法律面前是平等的。这与正统伊斯兰教尊重不同意见及宗教自由的精神是一致的。

6.       由于伊斯兰教的角色及影响在所有公民的生活里是如斯重要，不管是穆斯林或非穆斯林，一定会对伊斯兰教的地位及伊斯兰化的过程，包括推行伊斯兰刑事法，持有不同的意见。任何法律的修改，尤其是那些将会影响1963年马来西亚协议及联邦宪法所涵盖彰显的国家基本原则和精神， 所有人民不管是穆斯林或非穆斯林，都有权利给予意见。事实上，表达意见及辩论涉及公共利益的课题以达致最普遍的共识，不仅仅是人民代议士、政党、公民社会组织、学者及知识分子、媒体等的责任，任何公民也是责无旁贷的。

7.       打压对伊斯兰教及伊斯兰化持有不同意见的人，不论是把穆斯林指为异教徒，或把非穆斯林指为“敌对异教徒”，都将分裂穆斯林及马来西亚社会。事实是，“敌对异教徒”可以被杀戮的言论，将为暴力打开大门，引发社群/区域之间的冲突。这种无视于马来西亚国家的存在及威胁领土完整的不服责任的行为，必须被全民拒绝。

8.       所有的公职持有者必须热爱马来西亚及所有的人民。非穆斯林人民必须被接受为公民或“muwatinun”，他们是穆斯林公民在此共同土地的兄弟姐妹。任何意图以宗教分裂人民，甚至指责反对推行伊斯兰刑事法的人为“敌对异教徒”而可以被杀戮的人，不配掌有公职。他们应该被停止职务，以确保他们危险的思想不会蔓延，及被误认为国家的官方政策。

9.       所幸的是，马来西亚社会拥有敢于拒绝把穆斯林指为异教徒及把非穆斯林指为“敌对异教徒”的宗教师、学者、知识分子、政治人物、公民社会组织及政党。他们伸张正义及维护真理的道德勇气，为伊斯兰教的清誉及马来西亚的和睦，做出无比重要的贡献。

联署的公民社会组织：

All holders of public office must love Malaysia and all Malaysians. Non-Muslim Malaysians must be accepted as citizens ("muwatinun") and compatriots (ukhwah wataniah) of Muslim Malaysians. Whoever intends to split the Malaysian people with religion and even to legitimise the killing of others who reject the implementation of the Hudud punishments by calling them "kafir harbi" is not fit to hold public offices. Their service should be terminated so that their poisonous thoughts do not spread and get mistaken as the nation's official policies.

Civil Society Joint Statement

30 Jun 2016

All are citizens, no more "kafir harbi" or "kafir dhimmi"

We, the undersigning civil society groupsm take the following positions in response to the categorisation of some citizens as "kafir harbi”.

1.       The categorisation of humans into “kafir harbi” (non-Muslims who fight against Muslim rulers) and “kafir dhimmi” (non-Muslims who accept the supremacy of and protection from Muslim rulers) happened in the ancient time when most countries were mono-religious and human rights were not recognised and upheld. In such ancient context, when countries waged wars against each other, wars between countries appeared as wars between religions. In fact, some wars were fought in the name of faith when the strongest motivation was often territorial conquest in the pursuit of power and wealth. Due to the lack of religious freedom, whether or not Muslims could profess Islam often depended on the strength of Muslim political power. The dichotomic division of non-Muslims into "kafir harbi" who must be killed or "kafir dhimmi" who are subservient to Muslim rulers, must be understood in the context of deep inter-religious enmity.

2.   When the modern world consists of multi-religious nation-states, the dichotomy of hostile "kafir harbi" and the subservient "kafir dhimmi" is not only irrelevant but also dangerous, both internationally and domestically. Internationally, "wars between nations" cannot be seen as "wars between religions" as modern nation-states are more aligned by convergence in geopolitical and economic interests than by commonality in religion. Domestically, when a crime is committed by a non-Muslim against a Muslim, the non-Muslim offender is a criminal who breaks the laws of the nation-state and must be tried in due process, just as if s/he is a Muslim. The non-Muslim criminal is not a "kafir harbi" whom Muslims should take laws into their own hand to execute. Any call for lynching will only destroy a nation because it invites retaliations between citizens. And if such call is made and received in the name of religion, then the nation will eventually burn in the fire of communal riots.

3.       Great Muslim thinkers like Dr Yusuf al-Qaradawy have called for terms like "dhimmi" to be abandoned and for non-Muslim members of a nation to be recognise as “muwatinun” (citizens) just like their Muslim counterparts. This is in fact nothing new. According to Egyptian scholar Dr Fathi Osman, Muslims and non-Muslims indeed enjoyed equal citizenship in Madinah under the leadership of Prophet Muhamad s.a.w. because Madinah itself was also a multi-religious society. In fact, according legal scholar Al Ghunaimi Mohammad Talaat, the "dhimmi" status for the non-Muslims disappeared with the Ottoman Empire - the last Caliphate -- proclaimed in 1839 the principle of equality between Muslims and Christians.

4.       Born in 1963 with the merger of Malaya, Singapore (left in 1965), Sabah dan Sarawak as equal partners, Malaysia is a civil federation hosting a plural society. The relationship between Muslims and non-Muslims are one of fellow citizens (muwatinun) with equal rights and equal responsibilities. They are neither enemies to each other nor "the protector" on one side and "the protected" on the other side. The use of terms like "kafir harbi" or "kafir dhimmi" is not only hurtful to non-Muslim Malaysians, but also carries the negative connotation that Malaysia is but a project of Tanah Melayu (Malaya)'s territorial expansion.

5.       The revered position of Islam as the official religion for the Federation and all states but Sarawak should be well preserved by all parties and must not be abused by any party to suppress freedom of thought and expression or to marginalise other parties so much so that the good name of Islam is tainted. Article 10 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia guarantees the freedom of expression for citizens regardless of ethnicity and faith while Article 8 guarantees equality of all citizens before law. This is in line with the true spirit of Islam in celebrating differences in opinion and upholding religious freedom.

6.       Given the important roles and influences of Islam in the public life affecting all citizens, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, the diversity of opinion on the status of Islam and the process of Islamisation including the implementation of the Hudud and Qisas punishments is expected. On any changes to the laws, especially those which affect the spirit and basic principles of the nation expressed or implied in the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and the Federal Constitution, all citizens of Malaya, Sabah and Sarawak, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, are entitled the right to express their opinion. In fact, to voice views and to debate on issues involving public interests so that the best consensus may be attained is not a right, but a responsibility of elected representatives, political parties, civil society organisations, scholars and intellectuals, the media and any concerned citizens.

7.       Negating others who hold different views in Islam or Islamisation, whether it is calling Muslims "kafir" or calling non-Muslims "kafir harbi" will only divide the Muslim community and the larger Malaysian society. Statement that killing "kafir harbi" is acceptable will in fact open the door for violence and communal/regional conflicts. Thus, this practice of "takfir" (ex-communication and ostracisation) which denounces the existence of Malaysia as a nation-state and threatens its territorial integrity must be rejected by all Malaysians.

8.       All holders of public office must love Malaysia and all Malaysians. Non-Muslim Malaysians must be accepted as citizens ("muwatinun") and compatriots (ukhwah wataniah) of Muslim Malaysians. Whoever intends to split the Malaysian people with religion and even to legitimise the killing of others who reject the implementation of the Hudud punishments by calling them "kafir harbi" is not fit to hold public offices. Their service should be terminated so that their poisonous thoughts do not spread and get mistaken as the nation's official policies.

9.       Malaysia is blessed to have religious leaders, scholars, intellectuals, politicians, civil society groups, political parties that are courageous to reject the practice of calling Muslims "kafir" and calling non-Muslims "kafir harbi". Their moral courage to stand up for truth and justice greatly contributes to both the good name of Islam and the harmony of Malaysia.

PANDANGAN PAS YANG KOLOT, FEUDALISME DAN SONGSANG

KERAJAAN/PEMERINTAH TAK BISA DIKRITIK?

ATAU HANYA BISA DISATE, DIAMPU DAN DIJILAT-JILAT ?

 Ustaz Ahmad Marzuki Shaary, Ahli Parlimen Bachok dari Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS).

Sementara Ahmad Marzuki Shaary pula membawa beberapa kisah dari sejarah Islam dan kontemporari untuk menjustifikasikan beberapa tindakan-tindakan yang dilakukan oleh partinya, PAS. 

Namun kisah-kisah yang dibawa adalah kisah-kisah yang seperti yang telah dihujjahkan oleh Mujahid sebelumnya sebagai tidak menepati waqi'. 


Beliau yang juga tidak selesa dengan 


perkataan "mengkritik" kerajaan dengan 


menganggap perkataan itu sebagai kasar 


tapi lebih selesa menggunakan 


"menasihat" sesuai dengan dasar 


partinya  yang menjadi "penasihat" 


kepada kerajaan yang ada kini.


http://greenboc.blogspot.my/2016/06/naib-presiden-parti-amanah-negara.html


otak dan benak yang kurang rasional.........minda "sateisme"................

沒有一個宗教會叫人殺人，尤其在聖潔的齋戒月，召喚人做出殺人行為的，只有伊斯蘭國IS恐怖分子，沒料到此等極端字眼竟出自宗教顧問之口。

（檳城26日訊）行動黨秘書長林冠英嚴厲譴責彭亨州宗教師阿都拉曼奧斯曼，標籤行動黨和該黨黨員為“敵對異教徒”。

他說，根據他向穆斯林朋友了解，Kafir Harbi在伊斯蘭的意思是，“應被斬殺的異教徒”。

他怒斥，沒有一個宗教會叫人殺人，尤其在聖潔的齋戒月，召喚人做出殺人行為的，只有伊斯蘭國IS恐怖分子，沒料到此等極端字眼竟出自宗教顧問之口。

“如因反對伊刑事法而遭標籤，砂州首長阿德南也一樣反對伊刑法，是否我和阿德南都應被殺？”

指民行不曾反伊斯蘭

林冠英也是檳州首長，他今日在光大28樓，召開記者會時說，阿都拉曼奧斯曼的言論已傷害行動黨穆斯林及非穆斯林黨員，此等過火言論完全無法被接受。

他促請阿都拉曼奧斯曼收回有關言論，並學習因發表“檳州清真寺不可播放祈禱召喚”（Azan）言論，被揭發誣賴州政府的伊黨峇東色海區部主席沙拉魯丁，為自己的言論道歉。

他同時促請國陣，尤其巫統部長對阿都拉曼奧斯曼的行為表達立场。

「警方应该马上进行调查阿都拉曼奥斯曼是否是IS的支持者，以防止一些宗教极端分子刻意製造血腥，破坏我国安寧。」

「警方应该马上进行调查阿都拉曼奥斯曼是否是IS的支持者，以防止一些宗教极端分子刻意製造血腥，破坏我国安寧。」

同时警方也应该一併调查《马来西亚前锋报》以大篇幅刊登该言论的用意。

bias---local no good

Calvin said... 

 Well, sometimes biases are difficult to correct. I have somehow accepted that this is just how the world works. I don't mean giving up as I will still try to overcome the biases but I just don't get myself all riled up over it. This does not apply to wine only but the more damaging one is to people. I work in Civil Engineering and you will find that Client prefer to pay a British Engineer 5 times the pay of a local Engineer simply because he is British. And he is simply doing the work where a local Engineer can easily do it and will do it better than him because the local Engineer understands local construction practice better. I can understand if the works are very specialised where locals may not have the experience but this applies to almost any works where Malaysians or Asians have better knowledge. Well, like wine, we still seems to have the mentality that Europeans/Americans are better. Same thing applies to watches, Swiss manufacturers will look down on Seiko but if you look closely at the quality of Seiko, you can see that Seiko has already surpasses a lot of so-called luxury Swiss brand. 

beautiful cemetery--One of the loveliest ‪#‎cemetary‬ I have seen - at ‪#‎aldona‬ in ‪#‎mygoa‬ ------ People of this ‪#‎goan‬ village believe they live in the ‪#‎mostbeautiful‬ ‪#‎village‬ in the world.

IndiTales

 People of this ‪#‎goan‬ village believe they live in the ‪#‎mostbeautiful‬ ‪#‎village‬ in the world.

One of the loveliest ‪#‎cemetary‬ I have seen - at ‪#‎aldona‬ in ‪#‎mygoa‬

【今日北馬頭條】完工90% 玩失蹤 發展商清盤 買家大驚嚇

丹絨區國會議員黃偉益說，位于安順路Anson Cube的商業單位，在2010年尾推展，合約寫明36個月后竣工，但現在該計劃剩余大約10%工程而已，卻一直沒有動工，買家也無法聯絡到發展商，才赫然發現發展商已經清盤。

《姨媽的後現代生活》周潤發/斯琴高娃/趙薇/光影上海灘

Princess Diana shakes hands with an AIDS patient without gloves, a profound gesture at the time, 1991.

当年华总妇女组的屠龙手， 今日落得如此下场

（霹靂‧怡保6日訊）霹靂中華大會堂會長蔡偉強提醒，原任婦女組主席關名洙已在今年年初被革除會員籍，即對方已与該華堂無關，要求對方不要再利用該華堂婦女組主席的身分參与出席活動、主辦活動或發言。

蔡偉強今天向本報《大霹靂》社區報指出，霹靂中華大會堂已于今年1月29日通過理事會議，一致通過即日起革除原任婦女組主席關名洙的會員籍。

他說，霹華堂也已于5月31日通過理事會議，一致通過即日起解散華堂婦女組，直至重組婦女組工作完成。

他表示，既然關名洙已被霹華堂革除會員籍，再与霹華堂無關，也不可再以霹華堂會員的名譽，參与出席活動、發言或主辦任何的活動。

他指出，不過，對方卻在昨日以霹華堂婦女組主席的身分公開發表政見，于理不合。

因此，他說，霹華堂希望對方停止再利用華堂婦女組主席的身分，同時，也將發通告通知大眾對方已與該華堂無關。

至于為何解散原有的婦女組，他表示，因為婦女組已違反章程，細節方面他則拒絕談論。

本報致電聯絡關名洙時，她表示暫時不針對此事發言。（星洲日報‧大霹靂)

點看全文: http://mykampung.sinchew.com.my/node/420268#ixzz4Awe9kpB6 
Follow us: @SinChewPress on Twitter | SinChewDaily on Facebook